Again: the disability card can not be rented, the docking must be hit
The editor’s previous article "Don't have to work to get wages? After the release of "The Truth about the Disability Certificate: Welfare Cancellation + Joint Liability", there were discussions in the backstage and in the comment area about whether it should be attached to the Disability Certificate, and there was even some criticism of the editor.
Some people said:
“It’s good to be affiliated. Disabled people don’t have to work and can still get paid. , what’s wrong?”
Some people directly scolded, thinking“This editor is just looking for scolding”.
But here, the editor must make it clear again:
Referring to disability certificates is an illegal act and must be cracked down on. This position will not change.
No matter how loud the criticism is, the matter of being attached to the disability certificate cannot be "said to be a good thing".
1. Let’s make it clear first: it is illegal to rely on the disability certificate itself
Don’t beat around the bush, let’s just say the conclusion:
Disability certificates cannot be rented, lent or registered
Enterprises“Only paying money and not using people” is a fake employment
Individual participation in affiliated activities also involves legal risks
This is not a dispute of opinions, but a red line clearly written into policies and regulations.
Once confirmed, the possible consequences include:
Enterprise:
Cancellation of qualifications for disability pension exemptionRecovery of subsidies
Administrative penalties, even included in the letter Using blacklist
Individual:
Welfare eligibility is rechecked
In serious cases, it may involve fraud and cooperation with counterfeiting
So this matter cannot be packaged as"mutual fulfillment".
2. Why are there still people “supporting affiliation”?
The voices in the comment area did not appear out of thin air.
To sum up, it mainly comes from two types of people.
The first category: intermediaries
This category of people must be targeted.
Their characteristics are very clear:
Specialized matchmaking "Enterprise + Disability Certificate"
Take a commission from it and use words to beautify illegal activities
For example:
"Just a name, it will not affect anyone"
"National policies are not used in vain"
"If you don't do it, others will do it too"
In the final analysis, this is a gray industrial chain, and those who make profits are never the disabled, but the intermediaries themselves.
This category has no room for discussion and must be severely punished.
The second category: Disabled people who have given up hope of employment
This category of people is the truly sad voice in the comment area.
They usually say:
"I also want to go to work, but I can't find it"
"No one wants me anyway"
The editor can understand these words, but I cannot agree with them.
3. It seems that "each takes what he needs", but who is actually harmed?
The disability certificate is attached, it looks like:
Business saves money
Personal take Money
Both parties are "satisfied"
But those who are really hurt are the disabled people who want to be employed through labor.
The reason is very simple:
The company has "used the certificate" to complete the quota, and there is no need to actually recruit disabled employees.
Employment positions are directly occupied by "certificates"
The result is:
People who want to work→It is more difficult to find a job
People who don’t want to work→become “compliance tools”
Enterprises→Never be responsible for barrier-free employment
This is the most fatal problem of affiliation.
It does not help the disabled, but divides the disabled into "certified" and "capable" people.
In the end, people who really want to make money through labor are completely squeezed out of the job market.
4. Why do companies dare to affiliate?
BecauseNo one has verified "real employment" and "fake employment" is not strictly investigated
To tell the unpleasant truth:
It is not that some companies cannot provide jobs
I am unwilling to change the environment, manage, and take responsibility
So I choose the easiest way - spend money.
If we investigate thoroughly: ★★★★★
Affiliation must be checked
False employment must be punished
Subsidies must be linked to real jobs
Then will companies still "only need certificates, not people"?
The answer is self-evident.
5. The editor’s attitude is very simple
Referring to the disability certificate is not a welfare, it is illegal
Intermediaries must be severely cracked down, without any dispute
< span>Disabled people who really want to be employed are the ones that the policy should protect
Relevant departments must strictly investigate the phenomenon of fake employment in enterprises
The country’s good policies
cannot let intermediaries and some companies take advantage of loopholes.
You can disagree with the editor,
You can also continue the discussion in the comment area,
< p>But one thing must be made clear:Even if you say something illegal ten thousand times"understanding" cannot become "correct".
The editor will not retreat from this bottom line.
People who scold me are nothing more than--
Afraid of losing this "making money" opportunity
Don't want to Some people who want to get paid for their work
Some people who receive two subsidies and still go to affiliated institutions p>
Also--
Don't say words that will cause discrimination. You will never be able to get out if you are afraid of other people's words.
You can only overcome the hurdles in your heart by yourself!
The last thing I want to say to friends with disabilities, business owners and relevant departments:
The employment problem of disabled people can never be completely solved by issuing a document, and the implementation of policies requires more supervision.
Now that the "affiliation" chaos has emerged, we cannot just treat the symptoms but not the root cause. We must get to the bottom of it and solve the fundamental problem.
Why are business owners reluctant to actually hire people with disabilities? The editor can think of the following core concerns:
1. It is difficult to find disabled people whose work ability meets the job standards;
2. Hiring disabled people requires additional investment in resources to create a suitable employment environment;
3. If disabled people are unable to complete the job requirements, the dismissal process is complicated and there are many concerns.
In this regard, the editor has some practical suggestions, hoping to relieve business owners’ employment concerns from the policy or legislative level:
1. Build a special employment carrier: establish employment software for people with disabilities Industrial parks or incubation bases with hardware adaptation environments can attract enterprises to settle in and provide support such as rent reductions and tax concessions to reduce enterprise adaptation costs;
2. Improve relevant laws and regulations: clarify the professional ethics of persons with disabilities, and at the same time refine the process and standards for reasonable dismissal of enterprises to avoid a small number of people taking advantage of "Disabled people's identities" act rogue and over-protect their rights, allowing business owners to dare to hire people and feel confident about hiring people;
3. Strengthen precise skills training: abandon "going through the motions" training, combined with market job needs, provide targeted and practical skills training for disabled people, so that everyone can truly master the ability to live and work;
4. Disabled people themselves must also take the initiative to increase their value: don't just think about it "Others should provide me with a job", but more importantly, ask yourself "what do I know" and "what value can I create for the company". There is no such thing as "people with disabilities must be hired just because they are disabled". Just like many rural elderly people also face difficulties in life, but still work hard - value is always the core of the workplace.
The road to employment is never easy, and the employment of disabled people requires the joint efforts of many parties.
I hope everyone can contribute more ideas in the comment area, fewer complaints and more courage and action to face life positively.
Making policies more complete, companies more assured, and people with disabilities more confident is the right way to solve the problem.